Naturally, the latest AIRAC requires further expense. The following flight plan formats can be downloaded: Airbus Extended, FS2004, FSX, iFly 737NG, iFly 747V2, IVAO/IVAP, Level-D 767, PMDG Flightplan, PMDG Wind Uplink, QualityWings, Squawkbox, Wilco Airbus Evo, X-Plane.īetter yet, as of AIRAC 1403, there is no cost. will also provide the following:ĭetailed Navlog, ETOPS Planning, Plan Stepclimbs, Runway Analysis, NOTAMS, FIR NOTAMS.īased on current live weather conditions, will also provide the estimated Departure & Arrival Runways, the ETE, and the best Cruise Altitude for the chosen Airframe you'll be flying, with consideration to the present winds aloft - at precise altitudes. ![]() Nevertheless, will provide a professional flight plan, if you don't enter the waypoints directly. However, the best freeware flight planner that I've found, is at: Sometimes, I'll follow a real time flight via and plug in its route into ![]() I continue to utilize as it provides up to the minute real world flight followings, including waypoints planned and flown. Warm regards, Magnus Lorvik CEO of Threshold is some good advice in this thread. We anticipate a constructive conversation and believe that a harmonious resolution will further enrich the flight simulation community. It appears there might be an oversight, but I've encountered difficulties accessing your forums after registration. Should you prefer a private dialogue, our contact details are available on the Threshold website. We believe direct communication from PMDG would be enlightening and address the concerns of our editorial and readership. We invite PMDG to share their comments or a statement on this matter. It's essential for us to understand the basis of these claims and address them accordingly. We'd like to highlight that the recent piece penned by Rob Parks was our first critique of PMDG since Threshold's establishment. And when he refers to Randazzo’s, already questionable statement in this way, we can not ignore this. “737NG Driver” being a central part of the forum discussion, and an avid PMDG YouTuber, he does, to a large extent, represent PMDG and should be held responsible for his blackening of Threshold. We would appreciate PMDG's perspective, especially given the comment by Randazzo on the very post that brought the article to your attention, where Randazzo also insinuates the same accusations. This claim is significant and deeply concerning. In a video from "737NG Driver", Emmanuel Hagen alleges that Threshold has engaged in financial blackmail against PMDG. In return, you are free to comment and give feedback on the article, and we would highly consider publishing any statement you provide on the article, just as it is done in any general editorial. ![]() Just like how you decide to moderate in your forum, Rob Parks’s opinion piece on this matter is in our fullest right to publish. The recent actions taken on your forums have raised concerns not only within our team but also within the broader flight simulation community. At Threshold, we strongly advocate for open and respectful dialogue, believing that constructive criticism paves the way for advancements in our shared interests. Your right to do so in your own forum stands firm regardless of reasoning. The cause for this action was his feedback concerning the progress updates related to the EFB and its associated delays. Recently, we've noted a situation involving our editorial-in-chief, Rob Parks, who, according to him, was banned and subsequently got his status changed to "infracted" on your forums. We serve a dedicated base of readers and contributors deeply passionate about the flight simulation community. My name is Magnus Lorvik, and I represent Threshold. Dear PMDG Team, I hope this message finds you well.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |